Antigua and Barbuda vs Brunei Darussalam: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Antigua and Barbuda
70
in 2013
Brunei Darussalam
70
in 2013
Antigua and Barbuda rank
52nd
Brunei Darussalam rank
52nd
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Brunei Darussalam
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 70 against 70 in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Brunei Darussalam has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 52nd and Brunei Darussalam ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Brunei Darussalam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 70 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 70 | 70 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Antigua and Barbuda or Brunei Darussalam?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 70 against 70 in Brunei Darussalam as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Antigua and Barbuda and Brunei Darussalam?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Brunei Darussalam?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2013.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Brunei Darussalam rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 52nd and Brunei Darussalam ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.