Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Belarus
20
in 2013
Sao Tome and Principe
20
in 2013
Belarus rank
167th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
167th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Belarus
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 20 against 20 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 167th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 167th of 184 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10 | 20 | 10 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 20 | 20 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Belarus or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Belarus, at 20 against 20 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Belarus ranks 167th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 167th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.