Belgium vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Belgium
50
in 2013
Iran, Islamic Republic of
50
in 2013
Belgium rank
112th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
112th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Belgium
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 50 against 50 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 112th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 112th of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Belgium or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Belgium, at 50 against 50 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Belgium and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Belgium and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Belgium ranks 112th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 112th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.