Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Pakistan: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
50
in 2013
Pakistan
50
in 2013
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
112th
Pakistan rank
112th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Pakistan
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 50 against 50 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 112th and Pakistan ranks 112th of 184 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.67 | 50 | 3.33 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Pakistan?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 50 against 50 in Pakistan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Pakistan?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Pakistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Pakistan rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 112th and Pakistan ranks 112th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.