Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Central African Republic
60
in 2013
Eswatini
60
in 2013
Central African Republic rank
76th
Eswatini rank
76th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Central African Republic
- Eswatini
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 60 against 60 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 76th and Eswatini ranks 76th of 184 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 60 | 30 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 52.5 | 60 | 7.5 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Central African Republic or Eswatini?
- Central African Republic, at 60 against 60 in Eswatini as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Central African Republic and Eswatini?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Eswatini?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Central African Republic and Eswatini rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Central African Republic ranks 76th and Eswatini ranks 76th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.