Central African Republic vs Iceland: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Central African Republic
60
in 2013
Iceland
60
in 2013
Central African Republic rank
76th
Iceland rank
76th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Central African Republic
- Iceland
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 60 against 60 in Iceland, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 76th and Iceland ranks 76th of 184 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 60 | 30 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 52.5 | 60 | 7.5 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Central African Republic or Iceland?
- Central African Republic, at 60 against 60 in Iceland as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Central African Republic and Iceland?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Iceland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Central African Republic and Iceland rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Central African Republic ranks 76th and Iceland ranks 76th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.