Comoros vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Comoros
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 60 against 60 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
Comoros ranks 76th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 76th of 184 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 30 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 52.5 | 37.5 | 15 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Comoros or Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Comoros, at 60 against 60 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Comoros and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 0, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Comoros and Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Comoros ranks 76th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 76th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.