Congo vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Congo
60
in 2013
Saint Kitts and Nevis
60
in 2013
Congo rank
76th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
76th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Congo
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Congo currently reports 60 against 60 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 76th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 76th of 184 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 70 | 40 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 52.5 | 67.5 | 15 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Congo or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Congo, at 60 against 60 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Congo ranks 76th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 76th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.