Hong Kong vs New Zealand: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Hong Kong
100
in 2013
New Zealand
100
in 2013
Hong Kong rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Hong Kong
- New Zealand
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 100 against 100 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Hong Kong or New Zealand?
- Hong Kong, at 100 against 100 in New Zealand as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Hong Kong and New Zealand?
- 0, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and New Zealand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Hong Kong and New Zealand rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Hong Kong ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.