Marshall Islands vs Moldova: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index … 0-10 DB05-14 Score
Marshall Islands
90
in 2013
Moldova
90
in 2013
Marshall Islands rank
12th
Moldova rank
12th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index … 0-10 DB05-14 Score over time
- Marshall Islands
- Moldova
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 90 against 90 in Moldova, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Moldova ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 12th and Moldova ranks 12th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Marshall Islands averaged higher in 1 and Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 80 | 30 | Moldova |
| 2010s | 90 | 82.5 | 7.5 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Marshall Islands or Moldova?
- Marshall Islands, at 90 against 90 in Moldova as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Marshall Islands and Moldova?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Moldova?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Marshall Islands and Moldova rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Marshall Islands ranks 12th and Moldova ranks 12th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.