Marshall Islands vs Trinidad and Tobago: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Marshall Islands
90
in 2013
Trinidad and Tobago
90
in 2013
Marshall Islands rank
12th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
12th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Marshall Islands
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 90 against 90 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands ranks 12th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 12th of 184 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 90 | 40 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 90 | 90 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Marshall Islands or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Marshall Islands, at 90 against 90 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Marshall Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Marshall Islands and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Marshall Islands ranks 12th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 12th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.