Micronesia, Federated States of vs Romania: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Micronesia, Federated States of
90
in 2013
Romania
90
in 2013
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
12th
Romania rank
12th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Micronesia, Federated States of
- Romania
How they compare
Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 90 against 90 in Romania, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 12th and Romania ranks 12th of 184 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia, Federated States of | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 85 | 15 | Romania |
| 2010s | 90 | 90 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Micronesia, Federated States of or Romania?
- Micronesia, Federated States of, at 90 against 90 in Romania as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Micronesia, Federated States of and Romania?
- 0, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Romania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Romania rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 12th and Romania ranks 12th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.