Micronesia, Federated States of vs Vanuatu: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Micronesia, Federated States of
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 90 against 90 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Vanuatu ahead.
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 12th and Vanuatu ranks 12th of 184 countries.
Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia, Federated States of | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 61.67 | 8.33 | Micronesia, Federated States of |
| 2010s | 90 | 90 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Micronesia, Federated States of or Vanuatu?
- Micronesia, Federated States of, at 90 against 90 in Vanuatu as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Micronesia, Federated States of and Vanuatu?
- 0, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Vanuatu?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Vanuatu rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 12th and Vanuatu ranks 12th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.