Sao Tome and Principe vs Tajikistan: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Sao Tome and Principe
20
in 2013
Tajikistan
20
in 2013
Sao Tome and Principe rank
167th
Tajikistan rank
167th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 20 against 20 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 167th and Tajikistan ranks 167th of 184 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 30 | 10 | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 20 | 22.5 | 2.5 | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Sao Tome and Principe or Tajikistan?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 20 against 20 in Tajikistan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Sao Tome and Principe and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Tajikistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Tajikistan rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 167th and Tajikistan ranks 167th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.