Sao Tome and Principe vs Yemen: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Sao Tome and Principe
20
in 2013
Yemen
20
in 2013
Sao Tome and Principe rank
167th
Yemen rank
167th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Yemen
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 20 against 20 in Yemen, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Yemen has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 167th and Yemen ranks 167th of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 20 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 20 | 20 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Sao Tome and Principe or Yemen?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 20 against 20 in Yemen as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Sao Tome and Principe and Yemen?
- 0, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Yemen?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Yemen rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 167th and Yemen ranks 167th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.