Saudi Arabia vs Suriname: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Saudi Arabia
40
in 2013
Suriname
40
in 2013
Saudi Arabia rank
127th
Suriname rank
127th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Suriname
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 40 against 40 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Saudi Arabia ranks 127th and Suriname ranks 127th of 184 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 40 | 10 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Saudi Arabia or Suriname?
- Saudi Arabia, at 40 against 40 in Suriname as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Saudi Arabia and Suriname?
- 0, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Suriname?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Suriname rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 127th and Suriname ranks 127th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.