Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Uganda: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14)
Saint Kitts and Nevis
60
in 2013
Uganda
60
in 2013
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
76th
Uganda rank
76th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14) over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Uganda
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 60 against 60 in Uganda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 76th and Uganda ranks 76th of 184 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 60 | 10 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 67.5 | 60 | 7.5 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14), Saint Kitts and Nevis or Uganda?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 60 against 60 in Uganda as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14) between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Uganda?
- 0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Uganda?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Uganda rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) (db05-14)?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 76th and Uganda ranks 76th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the strength of legal rights benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.