Australia vs Hong Kong, China: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10)

Australia
10 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Hong Kong, China
10 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Australia rank
1st
Hong Kong, China rank
1st

Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) over time

  • Australia
  • Hong Kong, China
0246810200420082013

How they compare

Australia currently reports 10 DB05-14 methodology against 10 DB05-14 methodology in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 1st of 184 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 9 DB05-14 methodology 10 DB05-14 methodology 1 DB05-14 methodology Hong Kong, China
2010s 9.5 DB05-14 methodology 10 DB05-14 methodology 0.5 DB05-14 methodology Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10), Australia or Hong Kong, China?
Australia, at 10 DB05-14 methodology against 10 DB05-14 methodology in Hong Kong, China as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) between Australia and Hong Kong, China?
0 DB05-14 methodology, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Hong Kong, China?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
How do Australia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10)?
Australia ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Hong Kong, China: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10). Statizoid. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-credit-strength-of-legal-rights-index-0-10-db05-14-methodology/australia/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-credit-strength-of-legal-rights-index-0-10-db05-14-methodology/australia/hong-kong-sar-china/">Australia vs Hong Kong, China: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology)
Unit
DB05-14 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,790 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the appli­cable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 10 based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.