Belarus vs Jordan: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10)
Belarus
2 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Jordan
2 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Belarus rank
167th
Jordan rank
167th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) over time
- Belarus
- Jordan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 2 DB05-14 methodology against 2 DB05-14 methodology in Jordan, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 167th and Jordan ranks 167th of 184 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 DB05-14 methodology | 2 DB05-14 methodology | 1 DB05-14 methodology | Jordan |
| 2010s | 2 DB05-14 methodology | 2 DB05-14 methodology | 0 DB05-14 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10), Belarus or Jordan?
- Belarus, at 2 DB05-14 methodology against 2 DB05-14 methodology in Jordan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) between Belarus and Jordan?
- 0 DB05-14 methodology, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Jordan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Belarus and Jordan rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10)?
- Belarus ranks 167th and Jordan ranks 167th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 10 based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.