Belgium vs Chinese Taipei: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10)
Belgium
5 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Chinese Taipei
5 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Belgium rank
112th
Chinese Taipei rank
112th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) over time
- Belgium
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 5 DB05-14 methodology against 5 DB05-14 methodology in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 112th and Chinese Taipei ranks 112th of 184 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5 DB05-14 methodology | 4.33 DB05-14 methodology | 0.6667 DB05-14 methodology | Belgium |
| 2010s | 5 DB05-14 methodology | 5 DB05-14 methodology | 0 DB05-14 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10), Belgium or Chinese Taipei?
- Belgium, at 5 DB05-14 methodology against 5 DB05-14 methodology in Chinese Taipei as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) between Belgium and Chinese Taipei?
- 0 DB05-14 methodology, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Chinese Taipei?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Belgium and Chinese Taipei rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10)?
- Belgium ranks 112th and Chinese Taipei ranks 112th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 10 based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.