Chad vs Eswatini: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10)
Chad
6 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Eswatini
6 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Chad rank
76th
Eswatini rank
76th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) over time
- Chad
- Eswatini
How they compare
Chad currently reports 6 DB05-14 methodology against 6 DB05-14 methodology in Eswatini, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 76th and Eswatini ranks 76th of 184 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 DB05-14 methodology | 6 DB05-14 methodology | 3 DB05-14 methodology | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 5.25 DB05-14 methodology | 6 DB05-14 methodology | 0.75 DB05-14 methodology | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10), Chad or Eswatini?
- Chad, at 6 DB05-14 methodology against 6 DB05-14 methodology in Eswatini as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) between Chad and Eswatini?
- 0 DB05-14 methodology, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Eswatini?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Chad and Eswatini rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10)?
- Chad ranks 76th and Eswatini ranks 76th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 10 based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.