China vs Oman: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10)
China
4 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Oman
4 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
China rank
127th
Oman rank
127th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) over time
- China
- Oman
How they compare
China currently reports 4 DB05-14 methodology against 4 DB05-14 methodology in Oman, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
China ranks 127th and Oman ranks 127th of 184 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.83 DB05-14 methodology | 4 DB05-14 methodology | 1.17 DB05-14 methodology | Oman |
| 2010s | 4 DB05-14 methodology | 4 DB05-14 methodology | 0 DB05-14 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10), China or Oman?
- China, at 4 DB05-14 methodology against 4 DB05-14 methodology in Oman as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) between China and Oman?
- 0 DB05-14 methodology, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Oman?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do China and Oman rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10)?
- China ranks 127th and Oman ranks 127th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 10 based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.