Djibouti vs Yemen: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10)
Djibouti
2 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Yemen
2 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Djibouti rank
167th
Yemen rank
167th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) over time
- Djibouti
- Yemen
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 2 DB05-14 methodology against 2 DB05-14 methodology in Yemen, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Yemen has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 167th and Yemen ranks 167th of 184 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 DB05-14 methodology | 2 DB05-14 methodology | 1 DB05-14 methodology | Yemen |
| 2010s | 1.25 DB05-14 methodology | 2 DB05-14 methodology | 0.75 DB05-14 methodology | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10), Djibouti or Yemen?
- Djibouti, at 2 DB05-14 methodology against 2 DB05-14 methodology in Yemen as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) between Djibouti and Yemen?
- 0 DB05-14 methodology, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Yemen?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Djibouti and Yemen rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10)?
- Djibouti ranks 167th and Yemen ranks 167th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 10 based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.