Egypt vs Laos: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) … 0-10 DB05-14
Egypt
3 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Laos
3 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Egypt rank
146th
Laos rank
146th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) … 0-10 DB05-14 over time
- Egypt
- Laos
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 3 DB05-14 methodology against 3 DB05-14 methodology in Laos, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 146th and Laos ranks 146th of 184 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 DB05-14 methodology | 2.67 DB05-14 methodology | 0.3333 DB05-14 methodology | Egypt |
| 2010s | 3 DB05-14 methodology | 3 DB05-14 methodology | 0 DB05-14 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10), Egypt or Laos?
- Egypt, at 3 DB05-14 methodology against 3 DB05-14 methodology in Laos as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) between Egypt and Laos?
- 0 DB05-14 methodology, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Laos?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Egypt and Laos rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10)?
- Egypt ranks 146th and Laos ranks 146th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 10 based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.