Gambia vs Chinese Taipei: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10)
Gambia
5 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Chinese Taipei
5 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Gambia rank
112th
Chinese Taipei rank
112th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) over time
- Gambia
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 5 DB05-14 methodology against 5 DB05-14 methodology in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 112th and Chinese Taipei ranks 112th of 184 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5 DB05-14 methodology | 4.4 DB05-14 methodology | 0.6 DB05-14 methodology | Gambia |
| 2010s | 5 DB05-14 methodology | 5 DB05-14 methodology | 0 DB05-14 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10), Gambia or Chinese Taipei?
- Gambia, at 5 DB05-14 methodology against 5 DB05-14 methodology in Chinese Taipei as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) between Gambia and Chinese Taipei?
- 0 DB05-14 methodology, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Chinese Taipei?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Gambia and Chinese Taipei rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10)?
- Gambia ranks 112th and Chinese Taipei ranks 112th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 10 based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.