India vs Liberia: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10)
India
8 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Liberia
8 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
India rank
35th
Liberia rank
35th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) over time
- India
- Liberia
How they compare
India currently reports 8 DB05-14 methodology against 8 DB05-14 methodology in Liberia, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was India ahead.
India ranks 35th and Liberia ranks 35th of 184 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.75 DB05-14 methodology | 4 DB05-14 methodology | 3.75 DB05-14 methodology | India |
| 2010s | 8 DB05-14 methodology | 7.25 DB05-14 methodology | 0.75 DB05-14 methodology | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10), India or Liberia?
- India, at 8 DB05-14 methodology against 8 DB05-14 methodology in Liberia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) between India and Liberia?
- 0 DB05-14 methodology, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Liberia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2013.
- How do India and Liberia rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10)?
- India ranks 35th and Liberia ranks 35th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 10 based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.