Iran vs Taiwan: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) … 0-10 DB05-14
Iran
5 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Taiwan
5 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Iran rank
112th
Taiwan rank
112th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) … 0-10 DB05-14 over time
- Iran
- Taiwan
How they compare
Iran currently reports 5 DB05-14 methodology against 5 DB05-14 methodology in Taiwan, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iran ahead.
Iran ranks 112th and Taiwan ranks 112th of 184 countries.
Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Taiwan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5 DB05-14 methodology | 4.33 DB05-14 methodology | 0.6667 DB05-14 methodology | Iran |
| 2010s | 5 DB05-14 methodology | 5 DB05-14 methodology | 0 DB05-14 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10), Iran or Taiwan?
- Iran, at 5 DB05-14 methodology against 5 DB05-14 methodology in Taiwan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) between Iran and Taiwan?
- 0 DB05-14 methodology, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Taiwan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Iran and Taiwan rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10)?
- Iran ranks 112th and Taiwan ranks 112th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 10 based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.