Latvia vs Malaysia: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10)
Latvia
10 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Malaysia
10 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Latvia rank
1st
Malaysia rank
1st
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) over time
- Latvia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 10 DB05-14 methodology against 10 DB05-14 methodology in Malaysia, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10 DB05-14 methodology | 10 DB05-14 methodology | 0 DB05-14 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 10 DB05-14 methodology | 10 DB05-14 methodology | 0 DB05-14 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10), Latvia or Malaysia?
- Latvia, at 10 DB05-14 methodology against 10 DB05-14 methodology in Malaysia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) between Latvia and Malaysia?
- 0 DB05-14 methodology, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malaysia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Latvia and Malaysia rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10)?
- Latvia ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 10 based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.