Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10)
Namibia
7 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Zimbabwe
7 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Namibia rank
52nd
Zimbabwe rank
52nd
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) over time
- Namibia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 7 DB05-14 methodology against 7 DB05-14 methodology in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 52nd and Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7 DB05-14 methodology | 7 DB05-14 methodology | 0 DB05-14 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 7 DB05-14 methodology | 7 DB05-14 methodology | 0 DB05-14 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10), Namibia or Zimbabwe?
- Namibia, at 7 DB05-14 methodology against 7 DB05-14 methodology in Zimbabwe as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
- 0 DB05-14 methodology, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10)?
- Namibia ranks 52nd and Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 10 based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.