Papua New Guinea vs Chinese Taipei: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10)

Papua New Guinea
5 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Chinese Taipei
5 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Papua New Guinea rank
112th
Chinese Taipei rank
112th

Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Chinese Taipei
012345200420082013

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 5 DB05-14 methodology against 5 DB05-14 methodology in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 112th and Chinese Taipei ranks 112th of 184 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Chinese Taipei Difference Ahead
2000s 5 DB05-14 methodology 4.33 DB05-14 methodology 0.6667 DB05-14 methodology Papua New Guinea
2010s 5 DB05-14 methodology 5 DB05-14 methodology 0 DB05-14 methodology

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10), Papua New Guinea or Chinese Taipei?
Papua New Guinea, at 5 DB05-14 methodology against 5 DB05-14 methodology in Chinese Taipei as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) between Papua New Guinea and Chinese Taipei?
0 DB05-14 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Chinese Taipei?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
How do Papua New Guinea and Chinese Taipei rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10)?
Papua New Guinea ranks 112th and Chinese Taipei ranks 112th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Chinese Taipei: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10). Statizoid. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-credit-strength-of-legal-rights-index-0-10-db05-14-methodology/papua-new-guinea/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-credit-strength-of-legal-rights-index-0-10-db05-14-methodology/papua-new-guinea/taiwan/">Papua New Guinea vs Chinese Taipei: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology)
Unit
DB05-14 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,790 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the appli­cable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 10 based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.