Puerto Rico vs Singapore: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10)
Puerto Rico
10 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Singapore
10 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Puerto Rico rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) over time
- Puerto Rico
- Singapore
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 10 DB05-14 methodology against 10 DB05-14 methodology in Singapore, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10 DB05-14 methodology | 10 DB05-14 methodology | 0 DB05-14 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 10 DB05-14 methodology | 10 DB05-14 methodology | 0 DB05-14 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10), Puerto Rico or Singapore?
- Puerto Rico, at 10 DB05-14 methodology against 10 DB05-14 methodology in Singapore as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10) between Puerto Rico and Singapore?
- 0 DB05-14 methodology, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Singapore?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Puerto Rico and Singapore rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-10)?
- Puerto Rico ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-10) (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 10 based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.