Australia vs Rwanda: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12)
Australia
11 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Rwanda
11 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Australia rank
6th
Rwanda rank
6th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) over time
- Australia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Australia currently reports 11 DB15-20 methodology against 11 DB15-20 methodology in Rwanda, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 6th of 191 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12), Australia or Rwanda?
- Australia, at 11 DB15-20 methodology against 11 DB15-20 methodology in Rwanda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) between Australia and Rwanda?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Rwanda?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Rwanda rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12)?
- Australia ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 6th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 12 based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.