China vs Sudan: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12)
China
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Sudan
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
China rank
137th
Sudan rank
137th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) over time
- China
- Sudan
How they compare
China currently reports 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Sudan, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
China ranks 137th and Sudan ranks 137th of 191 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12), China or Sudan?
- China, at 3 DB15-20 methodology against 3 DB15-20 methodology in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) between China and Sudan?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sudan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do China and Sudan rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12)?
- China ranks 137th and Sudan ranks 137th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 12 based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.