South Sudan vs Chinese Taipei: Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12)
South Sudan
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
South Sudan rank
147th
Chinese Taipei rank
147th
Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) over time
- South Sudan
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Chinese Taipei has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 147th and Chinese Taipei ranks 147th of 191 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12), South Sudan or Chinese Taipei?
- South Sudan, at 2 DB15-20 methodology against 2 DB15-20 methodology in Chinese Taipei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12) between South Sudan and Chinese Taipei?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Chinese Taipei?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do South Sudan and Chinese Taipei rank globally for getting credit: strength of legal rights index (0-12)?
- South Sudan ranks 147th and Chinese Taipei ranks 147th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting credit: Strength of legal rights index (0-12) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. The index ranges from 0 to 12 based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.