Armenia vs South Korea: Getting Credit total score

Armenia
12 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
South Korea
12 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Armenia rank
37th
South Korea rank
37th

Getting Credit total score over time

  • Armenia
  • South Korea
02.557.51012.5200420082013

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 12 DB05-14 methodology against 12 DB05-14 methodology in South Korea, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.

Across all 10 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 37th and South Korea ranks 37th of 181 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia South Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 8.17 DB05-14 methodology 11.33 DB05-14 methodology 3.17 DB05-14 methodology South Korea
2010s 11.75 DB05-14 methodology 12 DB05-14 methodology 0.25 DB05-14 methodology South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting credit total score, Armenia or South Korea?
Armenia, at 12 DB05-14 methodology against 12 DB05-14 methodology in South Korea as of 2013.
What is the difference in getting credit total score between Armenia and South Korea?
0 DB05-14 methodology, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and South Korea?
10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
How do Armenia and South Korea rank globally for getting credit total score?
Armenia ranks 37th and South Korea ranks 37th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting Credit total score (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting Credit total score (DB05-14 methodology)
Unit
DB05-14 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,785 data points, 2004–2013
Last refreshed

The total score for getting credit is the sum of the strength of legal rights index and the depth of credit information index, based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.