Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Getting Credit total score
Guinea
6 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Sao Tome and Principe
6 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Guinea rank
139th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
139th
Getting Credit total score over time
- Guinea
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 6 DB05-14 methodology against 6 DB05-14 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 139th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 139th of 184 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 DB05-14 methodology | 2 DB05-14 methodology | 1 DB05-14 methodology | Guinea |
| 2010s | 5.25 DB05-14 methodology | 3 DB05-14 methodology | 2.25 DB05-14 methodology | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit total score, Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Guinea, at 6 DB05-14 methodology against 6 DB05-14 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit total score between Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0 DB05-14 methodology, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for getting credit total score?
- Guinea ranks 139th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 139th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting Credit total score (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The total score for getting credit is the sum of the strength of legal rights index and the depth of credit information index, based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.