Saudi Arabia vs Chinese Taipei: Getting Credit total score
Saudi Arabia
10 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Chinese Taipei
10 DB05-14 methodology
in 2013
Saudi Arabia rank
66th
Chinese Taipei rank
66th
Getting Credit total score over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 10 DB05-14 methodology against 10 DB05-14 methodology in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0 DB05-14 methodology.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Chinese Taipei has been ahead every year.
Saudi Arabia ranks 66th and Chinese Taipei ranks 66th of 183 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.17 DB05-14 methodology | 9.33 DB05-14 methodology | 2.17 DB05-14 methodology | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 10 DB05-14 methodology | 10 DB05-14 methodology | 0 DB05-14 methodology | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting credit total score, Saudi Arabia or Chinese Taipei?
- Saudi Arabia, at 10 DB05-14 methodology against 10 DB05-14 methodology in Chinese Taipei as of 2013.
- What is the difference in getting credit total score between Saudi Arabia and Chinese Taipei?
- 0 DB05-14 methodology, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Chinese Taipei?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2013.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Chinese Taipei rank globally for getting credit total score?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 66th and Chinese Taipei ranks 66th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting Credit total score (DB05-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The total score for getting credit is the sum of the strength of legal rights index and the depth of credit information index, based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.