Algeria vs Equatorial Guinea: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Algeria
88.1%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
89.0%
in 2019
Algeria rank
142nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
140th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Algeria
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 89.0% against 88.1% in Algeria, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Algeria ranks 142nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 140th of 191 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.3% | 94.0% | 13.8% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 83.7% | 90.6% | 7.0% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Algeria or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 89.0% against 88.1% in Algeria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Algeria and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.9%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Equatorial Guinea?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Algeria and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Algeria ranks 142nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 140th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.