Antigua and Barbuda vs Canada: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Antigua and Barbuda
98.7%
in 2019
Canada
98.6%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
60th
Canada rank
63rd
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Canada
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 98.7% against 98.6% in Canada, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 60th and Canada ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.6% | 98.2% | 0.3% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 98.5% | 98.4% | 0.1% | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Antigua and Barbuda or Canada?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 98.7% against 98.6% in Canada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Antigua and Barbuda and Canada?
- 0.1%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Canada?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Canada rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 60th and Canada ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.