Belize vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Belize
96.2%
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina
96.4%
in 2019
Belize rank
97th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
94th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Belize
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 96.4% against 96.2% in Belize, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Belize ranks 97th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 94th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.3% | 96.6% | 0.3% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 95.9% | 95.0% | 0.9% | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Belize or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 96.4% against 96.2% in Belize as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Belize and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0.2%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Belize and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Belize ranks 97th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 94th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.