Belize vs Sao Tome and Principe: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Belize
96.2%
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
95.8%
in 2019
Belize rank
97th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
99th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Belize
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Belize currently reports 96.2% against 95.8% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Belize has been ahead every year.
Belize ranks 97th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.3% | 91.3% | 5.1% | Belize |
| 2010s | 95.9% | 94.3% | 1.5% | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Belize or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Belize, at 96.2% against 95.8% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Belize and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.4%, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Belize and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Belize ranks 97th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.