Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Jordan: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
96.4%
in 2019
Jordan
96.5%
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
94th
Jordan rank
93rd
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 96.5% against 96.4% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 94th and Jordan ranks 93rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.6% | 94.8% | 1.7% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 95.0% | 97.0% | 2.0% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 96.5% against 96.4% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan?
- 0.1%, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 94th and Jordan ranks 93rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.