Brazil vs Trinidad and Tobago: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Brazil
97.5%
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
97.7%
in 2019
Brazil rank
79th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
78th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Brazil
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 97.7% against 97.5% in Brazil, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 79th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 78th of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.8% | 99.3% | 7.5% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 96.0% | 98.8% | 2.7% | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Brazil or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 97.7% against 97.5% in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Brazil and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.2%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Brazil ranks 79th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 78th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.