Brunei Darussalam vs Korea: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Brunei Darussalam
99.5%
in 2019
Korea
99.6%
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
34th
Korea rank
32nd
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Korea
How they compare
Korea currently reports 99.6% against 99.5% in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 34th and Korea ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brunei Darussalam averaged higher in 1 and Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.6% | 99.5% | 0.1% | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 99.5% | 99.5% | 0.0% | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Brunei Darussalam or Korea?
- Korea, at 99.6% against 99.5% in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Brunei Darussalam and Korea?
- 0.1%, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Korea?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Korea rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 34th and Korea ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.