Cape Verde vs Timor-Leste: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Cape Verde
83.8%
in 2019
Timor-Leste
84.5%
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
155th
Timor-Leste rank
153rd
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Cape Verde
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 84.5% against 83.8% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 155th and Timor-Leste ranks 153rd of 191 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.2% | 84.8% | 3.6% | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 82.6% | 88.2% | 5.6% | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Cape Verde or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 84.5% against 83.8% in Cape Verde as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Cape Verde and Timor-Leste?
- 0.7%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Timor-Leste?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Cape Verde and Timor-Leste rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Cape Verde ranks 155th and Timor-Leste ranks 153rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.