Cape Verde vs Palestine: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Cape Verde
83.8%
in 2019
Palestine
82.9%
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
155th
Palestine rank
156th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Cape Verde
- Palestine
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 83.8% against 82.9% in Palestine, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 155th and Palestine ranks 156th of 191 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.2% | 79.8% | 1.4% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 82.6% | 80.8% | 1.7% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Cape Verde or Palestine?
- Cape Verde, at 83.8% against 82.9% in Palestine as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Cape Verde and Palestine?
- 0.9%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Palestine?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Cape Verde and Palestine rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Cape Verde ranks 155th and Palestine ranks 156th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.