Chile vs Chinese Taipei: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Chile
99.4%
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
99.5%
in 2019
Chile rank
39th
Chinese Taipei rank
36th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Chile
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Chinese Taipei currently reports 99.5% against 99.4% in Chile, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Chinese Taipei has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 39th and Chinese Taipei ranks 36th of 191 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.1% | 99.4% | 0.3% | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 99.3% | 99.5% | 0.2% | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Chile or Chinese Taipei?
- Chinese Taipei, at 99.5% against 99.4% in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Chile and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.1%, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Chinese Taipei?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Chinese Taipei rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Chile ranks 39th and Chinese Taipei ranks 36th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.