Equatorial Guinea vs Vietnam: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income) … Score
Equatorial Guinea
89.0%
in 2019
Vietnam
87.7%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
140th
Vietnam rank
143rd
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income) … Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Vietnam
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 89.0% against 87.7% in Vietnam, a difference of 1.3%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 140th and Vietnam ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.0% | 59.6% | 34.4% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 90.6% | 79.5% | 11.1% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Equatorial Guinea or Vietnam?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 89.0% against 87.7% in Vietnam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Equatorial Guinea and Vietnam?
- 1.3%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Vietnam?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Vietnam rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 140th and Vietnam ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.