Hong Kong vs United Arab Emirates: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Hong Kong
100.0%
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
100.0%
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
4th
United Arab Emirates rank
1st
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Hong Kong
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 4th and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 99.8% | 0.2% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 99.8% | 0.2% | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Hong Kong or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Hong Kong as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Hong Kong and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.0%, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and United Arab Emirates?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and United Arab Emirates rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Hong Kong ranks 4th and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.