India vs Papua New Guinea: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
India
99.6%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
99.7%
in 2019
India rank
27th
Papua New Guinea rank
24th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- India
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 99.7% against 99.6% in India, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was India ahead.
India ranks 27th and Papua New Guinea ranks 24th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.7% | 99.1% | 0.6% | India |
| 2010s | 98.9% | 99.4% | 0.5% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), India or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 99.7% against 99.6% in India as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between India and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.1%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Papua New Guinea?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do India and Papua New Guinea rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- India ranks 27th and Papua New Guinea ranks 24th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.